From including students with disabilities to Inclusive Education: Portugal amends its education law

This post has been submitted by Paula Hunt, Senior Technical Advisor, Catalyst for Inclusive Education.

Inclusive Education, as first envisioned and promoted by the Salamanca Statement, has guided much of the education pathways in Portugal since 1995. However, this was not always the case. While the education of children with disabilities has been central to Portugal’s social development since the 1970’s, education for children with disabilities was traditionally provided in segregated settings, by a cadre of specialized professionals (special education), until the early 2000’s.

In 2008, in an effort to uphold its commitments under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), and ensure the “progressive realization” of inclusion, the Portuguese government approved a Law-Decree that envisioned the implementation of inclusive education by creating the conditions necessary for the education for children with disabilities to be provided in each child’s neighborhood school. Modeled after existing best-practices, promoting the social-model of disability, the 2008 Decree called for the tailoring of the education experience to each student, and disability to be conceptualized according to functional limitations, by a team of multi-disciplinary professionals, as early as possible (consistent with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, ICF).

While the 2008 Law-Decree worked from the assumption that a system that is good for children with disabilities is good for everyone, its implementation was problematic:

1) It was heavily reliant of categorization, it required that children were identified, categorized, and an intervention planned for, in order to access supports;

2) It was heavily reliant of the services of special education professionals, thus maintaining a parallel system of education;

3) It allowed for selective segregation within the neighborhood schools, whereby children with disabilities would spend time in segregated settings within a regular school;

4) Because it required the official identification of a functional limitation, children who did not qualify but required a more intensive level of support (i.e. migrants, refugees, the very poor, children with some degree of learning difficulty not on the threshold of a functional limitation, etc.) had difficulty accessing the services/accommodations needed to ensure their full participation, because special education resources were restricted to identified children with disabilities.

The new Law-Decree 54 approved on 6 July 2018, attempts to respond to these issues. Developed over the last 18 months, it aims to respond to UN recommendations related to social inclusion, as well as continue to uphold the commitments of the CRPD. Rather than simply enjoying the fruits of its considerable efforts towards ensuring the inclusion of children with disabilities in education, Portugal engaged in a systematic process of self-assessment since 2008. Rather than looking for the best-practices to be replicated, it engaged in the systematic recording of lessons-learned for the last 10 years. Thus, a rigorous process of monitoring (and collecting data related to) early identification/intervention, out-of-school children, the situation of children with disabilities, graduation rates and tertiary enrollment, as well as post-secondary employment, as lead to a new Law-Decree.

Based on foundational democratic principles, Law-Decree 54 (2018) envisions the non-categorical tailoring of the education experience by each school, to each of its students, and “even in cases where greater difficulty in participating in the curriculum is identified, it is up to each school to define the process in which it identifies the barriers to learning with which the student is confronted, considering the diversity of strategies to overcome them, in order to ensure that each student has access to the curriculum and to the learning, taking each and every one to the limit of their own potential”.

The new law, developed in tandem with the new flexible Curriculum is “based on universal design for learning and a multilevel approach to access the curriculum. This approach is based on flexible curricular models, systematic monitoring of the effectiveness of the continuum of implemented interventions, the dialogue between teachers with parents or caregivers, and in the choice of measures to support learning, organized at different levels of intervention, according to the educational responses necessary for each student to acquire a common base of competences, valuing their potential and interests. Thus, there is a moving away from the rationale that it is necessary to categorize to intervene. Rather, it is sought to ensure that the Profile of the Students at the end of Compulsory Schooling is reached by all, even if it is through differentiated learning paths that allow each student to progress in the curriculum in a way that ensures their educational success”.

In a young democracy, a country currently fraught with dissent between teacher unions, school management committees, and the Ministry of Education, the new Law will be implemented in September, but not without difficulty. While considerable efforts have been made to ensure a healthy and lengthy public debate prior to the drafting of the final document, and training opportunities and materials have been developed and disseminated, implementation of the Law is the responsibility of each school: “(The) central axis of orientation (is) the need of each school to recognize the added value of the diversity of its students, finding ways to deal with that difference, adjusting the teaching processes to the individual characteristics and conditions of each student, mobilizing the means at its disposal so that everyone learns and participates in the life of the educational community”.

It is essential that all Inclusive Education supporters monitor the implementation of the new Law-Decree 54 in Portugal, and reflect upon the good practices and the lessons that will undoubtedly be learnt from this brave move forward.

#SchoolForAll: an impact litigation strategy on the Right of Inclusive Education.

This post has been submitted by Lucas Correa, Research Director and Maria Valencia, Junior Researcher at DescLAB.

Lucas Correa and María Valencia from DescLAB.

The lawsuit #SchoolForAll [#EscuelaParaTodos in Spanish] was presented by Laboratorio de Derecho Económicos, Sociales y Culturales (DescLAB in Spanish) [Laboratory of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights-DescLAB], on June 16th, 2017. This lawsuit’s scope is to protect the Right to Inclusive Education for people with disabilities facing systematic exclusion from Colombia’s mainstream educational system.

 

Read More

Including children with disabilities in education: Inertia or tipping point?

This post was first published on Global Partnership for Education's Education for All blog. The author, Diane Richler, is Chairperson of Catalyst for Inclusive Education. 

December 3, 2017 marks the 25th anniversary of the proclamation of the International Day of Persons with Disabilities by the United Nations General Assembly. It is a day to reflect on the still too prevalent exclusion of children with disabilities from education and to ask tough questions:  Have the international commitments to quality and inclusive education signaled a tipping point towards major change? Or will the status quo of segregation and exclusion prevail for children with disabilities?

Read More

CRPD Committee - General Comment No. 4 (2016) on the Right to Inclusive Education (article 24)

This summary overview of General Comment No.4 was written by Paula Hunt, Senior Technical Advisor, Catalyst for Inclusive Education.

Inclusive education is central to achieving high-quality education for all learners, must be realized at all levels (preschool, primary, secondary and tertiary education, vocational training and lifelong learning, extracurricular and social activities), for all students, including persons with disabilities, without discrimination and on an equal basis with others. 

Read More

Welcome to the Catalyst for Inclusive Education Website

Written by Diane Richler, Chair, Catalyst for Inclusive Education.

Education has always been a top priority for members of Inclusion International. Most of our member organizations, in all parts of the world, were formed by parents because their children were not allowed to go to school with their non-disabled brothers and sisters. Parents knew that their sons and daughters could learn, and so in many places they started the first schools for children with intellectual disabilities.

As the self-advocacy movement grew and adults who had gone to special schools started to speak out, they described the hurt they felt not being part of the regular education system, and how going to separate schools or being in separate classes was a path to a life of segregation. Families and progressive educators recognized that “special education” did not mean good education, and that in fact, the same conditions that would allow students who had intellectual disabilities to thrive in regular classes would also improve education for all.

Over the past two decades, the world community has increasingly recognized that peace and prosperity are the result of closing the gaps between those who are most marginalized and the rest of society. That is why the global program for sustainable development and poverty reduction focuses on leaving no one behind, and has as one of its goals achieving “quality and inclusive education”.

Inclusion International was an active participant in the negotiation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and played a particularly active role in securing the wording of Article 24, which guarantees the right to inclusive education. Inclusion International also played an important role in collaborating with the CRPD Committee responsible for interpreting the Convention to ensure that its General Comment 4 defined inclusive education the way it is understood by Inclusion International.

But as our members know only too well, there is a vast chasm between law and people’s lives. Having the framework of the CRPD and General Comment 4 is important. Now we need to turn rights into reality.

That’s where the Catalyst for Inclusive Education comes in. In chemistry, a catalyst brings about a change in its environment. And that is exactly what the Catalyst intends to do. We are working with our members who want to advance inclusive education in their countries, and bringing support to them to spur on change. Some of that outside support is coming from other members of Inclusion International. Some is coming from individual experts, from educators, lawyers, other human rights organizations, or donors.

Transforming education systems to provide both quality and inclusion is a mammoth task. Inclusion International has the members, the networks, the vision, and the commitment to take it on.

Be part of the action! Catalyst is frequently developing new global resources on inclusive education and country-level initiatives. Check back often for updates as we work to advance inclusive education at the national, regional, and global levels.